Overview
The redevelopment of the Sepho Tableland is one example of North Korea's efforts to adapt its agricultural practices to perform better within the constraints of the land. This project sought to convert high elevation terrains, which are not conducive to crop production, into grassy fields for supporting livestock farming, thus increasing protein production while maximizing less than ideal land resources.
This project also demonstrated a culture shift in agricultural and consumption preferences. While pigs and chicken had historically been the preferred sources of protein, their grain consumption created higher demands on overall food production, diverting grain from the people. By shifting to grass-fed livestock farming, North Korea could increase protein production in a more complementary way.
Look Ahead
Satellite imagery allows us to assess the buildup of livestock facilities throughout the Sepho Tableland, but it is difficult to determine what that means in terms of actual output. It is clear that the efforts to transform this region have been underway since 2012, which accelerated in 2015 and 2016, and have made gradual progress since then. However, while the infrastructure is largely in place, this does not mean it will generate immediate results. Seed animals are needed, followed by several breeding seasons for herds to grow; and slaughtering animals too early will stymie that growth. Further monitoring of various sources is necessary to determine what impact the Sepho Tableland will have on North Korea's overall food production.
Things to Watch
- Will additional livestock and support facilities continue to be built in the Sepho Tableland?
- Will design changes to the facilities appear that would suggest adopting new techniques for grain efficiency?
- When might a notable increase of animal livestock be observed, both with the livestock paddocks and adjacent pastures?
- Will additional meat and milk processing factories be constructed, which would create greater capacity and suggest some level of program success?
- Will similar livestock facilities start to appear in mountainous areas of other provinces, as efforts to expand the “grass for meat” initiative?
Publication of this article does not constitute an endorsement of the contents, conclusions, or opinions of the author(s). The published article’s contents, conclusions, and opinions are solely that of the author(s) and are in no way attributable or an endorsement by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the Department of Defense, the United States Intelligence Community, or the United States Government. For additional information, please see the Tearline Comprehensive Disclaimer at https://www.tearline.mil/disclaimers.












